Letter: Labour rift is just not there
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Anthony Bevins sees the recent publication of candidates' manifestos for election to Labour's NEC as evidence for "an embarrassing display of Labour's continuing left-right divide" ("Labour battle plan reveals internal rift", 26 August).
There is nothing at all remarkable about the statements of the six candidates standing on the slate of the Socialist Campaign Group: their views are well known and, whilst I as a Labour Party member will not be voting for them, it would not surprise me if one or two of them are elected, since they do reflect a small but significant minority of opinion within the party.
What is more baffling is Mr Bevins's singling out of comments by Shadow Cabinet members as evidence for an "internal rift". In what sense is Gordon Brown departing from the leadership view by calling for "unifying socialist values" (it was, after all, Tony Blair who introduced the word "socialist" to the party's statement of aims and values)?
What is unusual in Robin Cook's pledge "to help most those whom the Tories have hurt worst" (surely the electorate would expect nothing less from a Labour Government) or in David Blunkett's promise to "eliminate the backlog of repairs and maintenance in our schools" (a promise contained in The Road to the Manifesto)? Anthony Bevins's analysis depends upon the false premise that new Labour's platform is based upon the abandonment of Labour's socialist values.
Nothing could be further from the truth: new Labour is, as John Prescott has said on several occasions, about "traditional [socialist] values in a modern setting".
Dr MARK PATTON
Carmarthen
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments