Letter: Labour must beware Murdoch

Frank Allaun
Tuesday 10 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: It does not make pleasant reading for democrats to follow Michael Leapman's informed article "Supping with the Devil" (7 January) or to see the photograph of Tony Blair in cosy contact with Rupert Murdoch. But it was time that such a feature articlewas published.

Admittedly the Times, Sunday Times and the Sun have softened their attack on the Opposition.It will not last. Six months before the next election, the Murdoch newspapers will change their tune and revert to their previous vicious campaigns. Of course, itwould be lovely if the media moguls maintained their critical stance towards the Conservative Government, but that is too much to hope for.

Murdoch, the Berlusconi of Britain, is, as usual, pursuing his business interests. These include the maintenance of his 50 per cent shareholding in Sky TV and thus his control of satellite TV in Britain, while still continuing his vast newspaper property. He fears that a Labour government might take steps to end the cross-ownership of TV and newspapers.

The Labour Party has long held that it is far too dangerous to leave media ownership concentrated in so few hands. With 4 million buyers and 10 million readers of the Sun every day, in addition to other huge Murdoch audiences, the die are too heavily loaded against ordinary people and against democracy itself.

The Labour Party's Press and Publicity Committee, which I chaired, produced a policy in the 1970s on the issue. It is to be welcomed that this Wednesday, Chris Mullin, MP, will produce a progressive Bill in the Commons along similar lines. It is almost certain, however, that the present government will not allow it to proceed. David Mellor, the minister then responsible, told me when I introduced a measure to provide the right of reply to distortion and inaccuracy in the media, that his colleagues wouldnever support even this limited measure.

The suggestion behind Mr Blair's three meetings with Murdoch is that some sort of deal is being considered (for example, Murdoch papers would refrain from attacking Labour, in exchange for the party excluding from its election programme any steps to freereaders from their present media domination by diversifying the biggest groups). Australia shows the folly of such an attempt.

There are signs that the Labour leadership may be considering weakening its present media policy. That would be a costly mistake and should be rectified without delay.

Yours faithfully, FRANK ALLAUN Manchester 7 January The writer was Labour MP for Salford East, 1955-83.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in