Letter: Keeping a check on rainy days of the week

Mr Norman Pattenden
Friday 23 July 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: George Nicholson's rainfall figures (Letters, 22 July) show that Sundays are driest by almost the same amount that Thursdays are wettest. The daily mean value is 134.13; the Sunday departure from this is 8.96 and the Thursday departure is 9.03 (all in inches of rain). Both values correspond to about 1.8 standard deviations, differences which would be considered barely significant in terms of most meteorological data.

Since it seems highly improbable that natural processes which induce rainfall are related to the days of the week, I suggest that Mr Nicholson seeks an interpretation in terms of manmade effects. The low Sunday value may be a clue that the working week could have a bearing on it. Summarising the rainfall over 39 years may obscure trends that a more detailed study would reveal. It might be worthwhile to look at public holidays; the possible effects of seasons could also be examined. In addition, he might consider whether there are local industrial sources of discharges to air which could conceivably affect the rainfall at his point of measurement.

Yours faithfully,

NORMAN PATTENDEN

Newbury,

Berkshire

23 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in