LETTER: Judging a balance of right and wrong
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr John Henderson
Sir: John C. Welch clearly had an unhappy experience of being a lay magistrate. I can recognise from my own, rather more limited, experience on the bench his concerns about the attitude of his colleagues, who use their appointments for making social contacts. However, such attitudes are far from typical and are becoming increasingly rare. Recent directions from the Lord Chancellor on the chairmanship of benches and of courts have brought about changes and improvement. Training is improving.
Both school governors and health authority members under some circumstances are required to act in a quasi-judicial manner.
Does Mr Welch really want a system where the verdict in a trial is the judgement of one individual? Appeals to the Crown Court are heard by a judge sitting with two magistrates.
Yours faithfully,
John Henderson
Alton, Hampshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments