Letter: Job shares are just as good for top posts

Ms Valerie Hammond
Tuesday 06 September 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In her Friday columns, Maggie Brown has regularly provided interesting comment on combining career and parenthood. However, her review of The Executive Tart & Other Myths - Media Women Talk Back (2 September) did nothing to progress thinking on flexible work patterns. Her assertion that 'job sharing and flexible working . . . only apply . . . near the bottom and middle of life's power echelons' is simply not true.

Management development and research work at Roffey Park Management Institute has brought us into contact with many successful job-sharers at all levels.

The international arm of the National Health Service - Overseas Enterprises - was set up by two job-sharing chief executives, a man and a woman. One of the world's most successful hotel groups, Accor, which includes the Novotel chain, is headed up by two job-sharing (male) chief executives.

Macro Group, an outstanding distributor of semiconductors, has doubled its size and productivity while offering flexible work to staff at all levels.

Provided job-sharers develop the skills to communicate effectively, an organisation can only benefit from such an arrangement. Surely it is better to have two people working a 30-hour week, than one person 60 hours?

Flexible work patterns can harness the skills of people at every level within an organisation. They can also help to keep the balance between work and home. This is relevant whether you are at the bottom, middle or top of life's 'power echelons'.

Yours faithfully,

VALERIE HAMMOND

Chief Executive

Roffey Park Management

Institute

Horsham, West Sussex

2 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in