Letter: Jan Kavan: the questions that remain unanswered
THE OBSERVER's number is in the London telephone book, under 'O'. I was surprised therefore that Alex Kershaw did not get in touch with me. Had Mr Kershaw spoken to me I would have told him the following. The three most important pieces of evidence which cast doubt on Kavan's credibility are as follows: the video-taped session of Kavan drinking champagne with the secret police after the revolution; the 'Source Kato' file from 1969-70 in the StB (secret police) archives; Kavan's own admission that he had 'misled' the Broadcasting Complaints Commission.
Three questions remain unanswered after Kershaw's piece:
Why did Kavan drink champagne with the secret police after the revolution? Why did the secret police think Kavan was a collaborator from 1969-70? After that we simply don't know - the file was weeded in 1989 - but before the revolution. Why did he mislead the BCC - a body hardly made up of secret policemen?
John Sweeney
The Observer
London SW8
On 5 March 1992, the BCC held that Mr Kavan misled the commission and annulled its earlier finding. It is now accepted that the Thames TV programme was accurate and fair.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments