Letter: James and witches
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Don Howe (letter, 8 January) cites James I as a witch-burner. He was the author of a book on demonology and took an active part in the notorious case of 1591. However, in 1605 he personally examined Anne Gunter, who had claimed that she was suffering from demonic possession. Eventually she confessed she had faked everything. James revised his ideas on witches and no longer encouraged their persecution.
ALAN FORGAN
Guildford, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments