Letter: IVF pledge is underfunded

Dr Brian Lieberman
Saturday 05 February 2005 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The importance of the Government's acceptance of the guidelines issed by the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (Nice) should not be underestimated. For the first time a government has recognised that infertility is a disorder that may require treatment by IVF within the NHS, but the Government has simply failed to fund these treatments. Paying for IVF is, however, not the only problem: the costs of caring for IVF twins are high. It is reasonable for the NHS to limit women at high risk of multiple birth to one embryo. In Manchester there is still a postcode lottery for IVF treatment. Nevertheless the majority (62 per cent) of primary care trusts (PCTs) are purchasing three cycles, 31 per cent a single cycle and 7 per cent two. No PCT has indicated that it will be reducing the number of cycles and all have waiting lists in excess of two years.

The UK leads the world with the regulation of IVF treatment and embryo research. Although the 1990 Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act is imperfect, it is not fundamentally flawed. Regulation has been an unqualified success and any future Act should build on the strengths of the original.

Dr Brian Lieberman

Director of Reproductive Medicine

St Mary's Hospital Manchester

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in