Letter: It's time to rid ourselves of this royal embarrassment

Jane Hoadley
Saturday 25 November 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

YOUR coverage of issues raised by the Panorama scoop appeared to me to treat your readers as zombies (19 November).

It is true that of the range of constitutional issues, the monarchy presents special difficulties - the personal position of the Royal Family, the power vested in the Establishment and an unfortunate history relating to the control of monarchs - which may make people anxious.

What is needed is a debate on how to end, or maybe amend, an anomaly that has survived, against the odds, into a modern age and has become a source of embarrassment to at least a large minority of the population.

Ian Jack points out the failure of any left-of-centre newspaper to come out in favour of republicanism, in part for fear of losing readers ("The royal show that none of us can bear to switch off", 19 November). The Economist recently published a lengthy and worthwhile series on constitutional matters including the abolition of the monarchy. Did their circulation decline as a result? Their articles were analytical and compelling, avoiding personality and sentimentality.

No one wishes the Windsors harm, simply that we move on and cleanse the psyche of the British people of coronation mugs and the other sentimental junk which obsesses them as subjects of the House of Windsor.

Jane Hoadley

Eastbourne, East Sussex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in