LETTER: It's the police who are over the limit
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: While not wishing to condone drinking and driving, I would like to comment on your report "Drivers take sober turn" (22 December), which states that only 4.6 per cent of drivers tested were found to be over the drink-drive limit. This can be taken to reflect a worrying aspect of the erosion of civil liberties.
The objective of the police should be to stop and arrest those who are over the limit. The ideal result would be to stop and test only the 818 who failed the test and not to have tested the 17,107 who were found to be under the limit. These citizens havebeen detained unnecessarily.
It appears to me that the police, by their failure rate of 96 per cent, may be operating a policy of stopping motorists indiscriminately without any reference to their alcohol intake. If the police were to announce that their arrest-to-charge rate was aspoor as this for other offences, there would be widespread concern.
Yours faithfully, P. W. SITCH London, SW18
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments