LETTER: Is Howard right to resist EU anti-racism legislation?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Hameed Moolla
Sir: For once the Home Secretary, Michael Howard, should be commended for resisting European pressure to make "denial" of the Holocaust illegal ("Howard opposed racism law 'to protect Rushdie' ", 25 November). To criminalise those suffering historical amnesia would set a precedent and lead to stifling public debate and an attack on free speech.
While most Christian leaders maintain silence, many deny that the barbaric transatlantic slave-trade was financed by Christian and Jewish merchants with more than just tacit approval of the Church and Rabbis. Should those with selective memory who deny or distort the facts about the slave trade be also criminalised? Should only those suffering from historical amnesia be prosecuted for denying the Holocaust in which millions of Jews and gypsies were killed?
Denial of well-documented acts of barbarism, being selective with facts, taking a myopic view or distorting facts are not for the criminal courts but, in a democracy, as history for open discussion, analysis and debate. However, incitement to violence or hatred on grounds of colour, religion, race, national or ethnic origin should all be considered criminal acts as they affect social order and harmony.
Yours faithfully,
Hameed Moolla
Nailsea, Avon
26 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments