Letter: Iraq and the UN

Dr Kabir-Ur-Rahman Khan
Tuesday 17 February 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE measures which the United Nations Security Council sanctioned to secure Iraq's withdrawal from Kuwait in 1991 were soundly based. But on that sound base, in the heat of the general condemnation of Iraq, the United States secured the adoption of many resolutions which had very little to do with the original violation of international law. If the US had proposed public hanging of Saddam Hussein in front of the White House, the Security Council at that time would most probably have approved.

The threatened bombardment hence cannot be justified in this instance by reference to the formal resolutions of the Security Council. It should accord instead with the Charter of the UN. One of the basic requirements for mounting an attack on a sovereign state is that there should be an impending threat of use of force by that state. No one has produced any evidence that Iraq is going to attack any neighbouring state. Mere possession of lethal weapons in itself does not make a case for attack; if that were so, several members of the United Nations, including most of the permanent members of the Security Council, would be suitable targets.

Dr KABIR-UR-RAHMAN KHAN

Edinburgh

The writer is former Senior Lecturer in the Department of Public International Law, University of Edinburgh

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in