Letter IQ tests measure potential, not accomplishment
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mrs Pam Jarvis
Sir: Even if we were to disregard years of well-supported research documenting the environmental influences upon IQ levels, and accept the postulation that IQ levels are decided by genetics, surely all IQ test scores would reflect is such "unborn potential. This is the way they were used by the old 11+ examination.
Dr John Tooley has obviously recognised this point and attempted to gloss over it, suggesting that vital factors such as self-motivation and diligence should be covered by "letters of recommendation". However, he does not make it clear from which non-class motivated, non-sexist, non-racist, completely impartial source such letters should emanate.
People with high IQs stemming from either genetic or environmental influence, or a mixture of the two, who are diligent and self-motivated will do well by the current examination systems. As such, this system, with all its imperfections, works far better than one which attempts, under the guise of a simple test of genetic aptitude, to set up an old boys' club of "recommendation letters".
Yours faithfully,
Pam Jarvis
Leeds
26 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments