LETTER:Invisible wives
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mrs Victoria Booth
Sir: With reference to the labelling of families (letters, 11 August and 15 August), the ultimate is, of course, the armed forces. Years of being referred to as w/o (wife of) followed by your husband's current post, abbreviated to a series of initials and numbers, has caused untold numbers of previously sane women (and men) to become jibbering wrecks. When serving abroad, it is especially frustrating to be confronted with the ubiquitous "husband's rank, unit and number" when registering with the doctor, dentist and even the library, where it is still necessary for the husband to sign the registration card before the family can join, even if he never enters the library or reads a book again.
Yours faithfully,
Victoria Booth
Paderborn, Germany
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments