Letter: Internet freedom
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NO DOUBT Lord Irvine of Lairg is satisfied that he has prevented James Hulbert from exercising his right to freedom of speech ("Irvine closes down anti-judge website", 7 November). Along with Tony Blair, he fails to understand the internet. The pages he objects to are on Mr Hulbert's computer, at home. It so happens that they were published, until Lord Irvine's intervention, on the server provided by Kingston Internet Webmaster, which internet service provider (ISP) has now removed them.
However, Mr Hulbert, using a different (free, UK-based) ISP could sign up to any number of free website host servers based in the USA, Australia, indeed almost anywhere in the world. He could then simply post his pages on to one of those sites.
So Lord Irvine will insist that "someone" will have to spend untold sums of (public) money discovering how Mr Hulbert has manoeuvred his pages on to a computer based in another country. Available to view, of course, wherever there is an internet-linked computer.
Governments around the world are failing to realise that they are, little by little, losing control of the countries they believe they represent. A freedom of information Act is irrelevant in the UK when I could find the same (UK-barred) information published on a site in America, Russia, or almost anywhere else.
MICKY GWILLIAM
London SW11
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments