Letter: Inspecting Ofsted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Letter: Inspecting Ofsted
Sir: Ofsted's methodology needs constant assessment if it is to help in the continual raising of school standards. But surely there is an easy explanation for the fact that standards in uninspected schools are rising faster than those which have been inspected (report, 6 May)? Doesn't one tend to work harder in the period before an inspection than after one - especially if one knows that the next one is not due for four or five years?
The only astonishing thing about these statistics is that no one from Ofsted chose to present this interpretation as support for the system of inspections. And all the more surprising since, when I put the facts to a group of 12-year-olds, they offered this explanation within 30 seconds.
RICHARD WELCH
Denbigh
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments