Letter: Innocent Irish in British jails

Joe Murphy
Thursday 16 May 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: So, four years after the government forensic research establishment was found by the Court of Appeal, when it quashed the wrongful imprisonment of Judy Ward, to "have plainly succumbed to the dangers of partisanship", innocent men convicted with tainted evidence may still languish in British prisons, required to wait on the outcome of yet another inquiry which Michael Howard, in his reluctant Commons statement, made clear would end up on his desk and for his consideration ("Semtex error could free 12 IRA men", 15 May).

What real purpose does the Criminal Cases Review Authority, set up out of the Birmingham Six Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, have then? Is it just another poodle to the Home Secretary.

All such convictions, including similar convictions in Northern Ireland, should be quashed on the grounds that it is now impossible to exclude the possibility of contamination, given the abysmal standards of the UK's government forensic science services.

It is now time, at this crucial stage in the Irish peace process when Sinn Fein is being expected even by the US to convince the IRA that the British government is trustworthy to some degree, that the Irish government finally asserts its rights under the Anglo-Irish Agreement to be consulted about the independence of any review of the forensic science service, especially in Northern Ireland, so as to be able to reassure the Irish nationalist community about its fairness.

Otherwise, perhaps this matter of the innocent Irish prisoners languishing in British prisons should be the first item on the agenda of all-party talks on 10 June, as opposed to "decommissioning" and calls for the forensic testing of decommissioned weapons.

Joe Murphy

Birmingham

The writer was formerly secretary of the Campaign for the Birmingham Six (England).

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in