Letter: Innocence, justice, compassion and judicial killing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.sir: It must be a bitter blow for Derek Bentley's family that the Home Secretary has refused to grant a posthumous pardon. Like his predecessors, Mr Clarke prefers to leave such matters well alone.
But Derek Bentley's case is not unique. Edith Thompson was executed on 9 January 1923 for her (supposed) complicity in her husband's murder. Since then her innocence has been established so that it is hardly a matter of debate. Yet Edith Thompson, like Derek Bentley, officially remains as guilty now as when she was condemned to death.
I am sure that, knowing of similar cases, the Home Secretary has decided to play safe. In so doing, he ensures that these miscarriages of justice continue to blot our judicial record.
Yours faithfully,
JOHN CLARKE
Crookes, Sheffield
2 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments