Letter: Inefficacy of prayer
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The recent correspondence on prayers for the Royal Family has ignored one vital aspect of the question: does it make any difference to those being prayed for? As long ago as 1877 Francis Galton showed, in his paper Statistical Inquiries into the Efficacy of Prayer, that members of royal houses - despite the regular and near-universal prayers for their longevity - in fact died younger than any other of the groups he analysed, including officers in the Army and Royal Navy. Perhaps some latter- day Galton will examine the effect on royal life expectancy of the diminishing number of prayers on their behalf, after correcting for general improvements in health and medical care.
Yours sincerely,
NIGEL GREENWOOD
London, N22
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments