Letter: India's need for religious tolerance
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I am forced to reply to the intolerance and inaccuracies in the letter from H. N. Pandey (1 March). The case for calling the RSS in India a 'neo-fascist' organisation is not only linked to its reliance on the politicisation of religion, but more importantly to its use of violence and intimidation against non-Hindu communities. Referring, moreover, to the presence of Muslim fundamentalist political parties in other countries in no way weakens the justification for calling the RSS, Shiv Sena, etc, neo-fascist as well.
The second point on which Mr Pandey is manifestly incorrect is that of the numbers of Hindu citizens of, among other countries, Bangladesh. Almost 15 per cent of Bangladeshis are Hindus and this proportion has not declined in the more than 20 years that Bangladesh has been an independent nation. Communal nirvana does not describe Bangladesh. Hindu fundamentalists, however, too often resort to spurious accounts of mass intimidation of Hindus in Bangladesh to justify communalism in India.
Third, may I say that the project before all tolerant people in India is not that of forcing Muslims unhappy with religious intimidation to move to a foreign country, Pakistan or Bangladesh, as Mr Pandey dares to recommend, but to provide a society based on principles of secularism in which everyone can feel secure regarding their personal faith.
Yours sincerely,
TRINA HAQUE
Cambridge
1 March
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments