Letter: Inaccurate costs that deny civil rights to the disabled
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Rosie Waterhouse ('Disabled 'under attack from Tory right wing' ', 31 August) highlights the attacks on the rights and incomes of disabled people.
In challenging the Government's estimate that the Civil Rights Bill would cost pounds 17bn, the two reports for the Rights Now campaign showed that the Bill could have been introduced at no cost whatsoever. One reduced the Government's cost compliance assessment to pounds 5bn; the other estimated that the cost of excluding disabled people from the workforce could be as much as pounds 5bn per year - wiping out the Government's pounds 17bn estimate.
The Government has failed to produce a proper costs-benefit analysis of the Civil Rights Bill, instead publishing a consultation document which neglects important areas, such as transport and education. This is no substitute for civil rights.
Press reports suggest that the Government subsidy to Remploy runs in the order of pounds 80m. Our estimates show that the cost of excluding from employment those disabled people who may be able to work, amounts to pounds 9,000 per person per year. On this basis, putting 9,000 Remploy employees out of work would also cost pounds 80m in payment of benefits and lost tax revenues.
Finally, changes to the benefits system should concern all working people. Any of us could become sick or disabled or unemployed. Yet we are now paying substantially more in national insurance contributions and destined to receive less if we need to claim incapacity benefit or job- seekers' allowance in the future.
Yours sincerely,
MARILYN HOWARD
The Disability Alliance
London, E1
31 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments