Letter: In the political endgame, Kenneth Clarke is the winner

Dr Stephen Haseler
Friday 20 June 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The defeat of Ken Clarke for the Tory leadership is a good time to mark what may turn out to be his seminal contribution to contemporary British polities. It now seems clear that had Clarke, whilst Chancellor, not stood firm on the European question then the Conservatives would almost certainly have committed themselves against a single currency as part of their general election campaign. This, in turn, would have forced the hand of election-conscious New Labour, who could have been counted on to follow suit.

Once made - even in the heat of a protracted election battle - these campaign commitments tend to stick. Therefore, Britain, under New Labour, would by now have probably ruled out single currency membership in the first tranche, a fateful dynamic which could have taken the country out of monetary union for all time, and indeed even put at risk our position in the single market.

By standing firm on European policy Ken Clarke, like Roy Jenkins before him, knew exactly what he was doing, and consciously placed his beliefs ahead of his career. This kind of politics is rare in the increasingly superficial public-relations dominated world of Westminster. Clarke will not now become Prime Minister, yet he can console himself with the thought that he will probably have played a more important role in the real political endgame than those who won the (increasingly tattered) crown.

DR STEPHEN HASELER

London W8

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in