Letter: In search of electoral reform
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your articles today do not mention the main consequence of the Plant Commission's proposed Supplementary Vote system. Under it, each MP elected would have the votes of at least 50 per cent of his or her constituents. Consequently, a government (coalition or otherwise) with a majority of MPs could claim to have the support of the majority in the country.
Although the system is not proportional, its justice in this respect would be hard to dispute. Most recent oppositions have been able to criticise governments for pushing through unpopular measures without the support of the majority of voters. If, as you say, the SV system 'is unlikely to redraw the electoral map in any grand way', would immunity from such criticism make for better government, or worse?
Yours faithfully,
JULIAN GALL
Godalming,
Surrey
21 April
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments