Letter: If the NUS is a closed shop then so is the local library
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOUR article 'Patten ready to outlaw student union closed shop' (27 June) reported on a controversial issue while using the loaded vocabulary of only one of the antagonists.
What justification is there in referring to student unions as 'closed shops'? Would you describe local libraries in these terms? All members of a local borough are entitled to use them, they make representation on behalf of library users to local authorities, and engage in national debates on such matters as VAT on books. No one is forced to use them. This is also the reality of student unions.
Student unions are providers of services and facilitators of student activities. They also ensure, through their representative role, effective communication with policy-makers at university, local and national levels.
The Government's distaste for student unions is based upon a misnomer, perpetuated by your article, that they are analogous with trades unions. They are not. Their spending is regulated by their status as educational charities. Their accounts are audited, as with any company. Their funding is solely determined by their parent institutions, who can withdraw all or part of such support.
This may explain why the majority of vice-chancellors (not the most left-wing body in the country) oppose the abolition of universal membership - perhaps a more accurate definition of Mr Patten's 'closed shop'. Your article led not to illumination, but rather to a further muddying of turbulent waters.
Mat Davies
President, University of Bristol Students' Union
Clifton, Bristol
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments