Letter: Hypocrisy of print journalists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Roger Gale, MP
Sir: A pity that your reporter who quoted (10 July) my views relating to BBC presenters' extra-contract earnings conveniently omitted half of the "story". I, and others in the House of Commons, are I think justifiably critical of the hypocrisy that allows BBC interviewers publicly to criticise Members for having outside interests, while themselves cashing in on the worldwide reputation of the BBC to earn interesting additions to their own incomes.
However, print journalists are as culpable, if not more so. Forgetting, momentarily, those "correspondents" who can only test-drive cars or "review" films while staying at the best hotels in the South of France, those foodie and travel writers who dine out and holiday in return for a "puff", and the "insider" scribblings of those with interests in the City, it might be wise not to scrutinise too closely the vested financial and political interests of those in some newsrooms. Or their expense accounts.
I dare say that BBC and, for that matter, ITV journalists and presenters do have something to answer for. But look at the beams in your own eyes, brothers, before you get too sanctimonious.
Yours etc,
Roger Gale
MP for Thanet North (Con)
House of Commons
London, SW1
11 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments