Letter: Hunger strikers' rights denied
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The one piece of good news to have come out of the crisis over the hunger strikers is that the Government has decided not to detain asylum seekers on a second-hand American prison ship. That would have been even more awful than being locked up in Rochester prison.
However, hunger strikes by asylum detainees are not about the conditions of detention, but about the fact of detention. The vast majority of detained asylum seekers have not been brought before any court or been charged with any crime. There is no way in which the legality of their detention can be tested in the courts, and there is no limit on the time for which they may be held. The Home Office refuses to give written reasons for detaining them. They feel a deep sense of injustice.
M LOUISE PIROUET
Charter '87
Cambridge
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments