Letter: Howard tilts the scales of justice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Certain implications of the proposed change in categorising criminal offences appear to have been overlooked hitherto ("Howard under fire over plans to curb jury trial", 28 February; letter, 6 March). If offences are down-graded to being triable by magistrates only, with no option to the crown court, the following consequences will flow.
The advance disclosure rules will no longer apply to a summary-only offence and the prosecution will be under no obligation to provide advance information of the case against the defendant. Recent high-profile cases have clearly indicated the dangers inherent in inadequate disclosure to the defence, and it would be no comfort to a defendant facing trial to be told that the offences involve "only" a theft from a shop or "only" a minor assault if he or she feels aggrieved at the result.
It is becoming increasingly difficult to obtain legal aid to represent defendants charged with summary-only offences. Each legal aid application is determined not only on the defendant's means but on the test of the "interests of justice", and many courts will routinely refuse legal aid on the basis that the perceived danger to the defendant is not high enough to warrant its grant.
PETER RHYS JONES
Solicitor
Carmarthen
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments