Letter: How the system fails the mentally ill on the streets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.EMER Gillespie is right to be concerned about those who are obviously disturbed on the streets. However, she does not seem to realise the obligations of the police, set out in section 136 of the Mental Health Act 1983. They are empowered to take to a place of safety (usually a hospital) anyone who appears to be 'in immediate need of care and attention' whom they encounter 'in a place to which the public has access'. Unfortunately many constables are not aware of these powers or are reluctant to use them.
The unenthusiastic response she describes is sadly not uncommon. In police culture apprehending the mentally ill is a fairly low-status activity. To be fair, it tends to be very time-consuming. They will often have to wait at the place of safety for a psychiatrist and a social worker to complete the assessment. They may subsequently have to escort the patient to another hospital. However, the law is the law and they are its agents.
One should therefore never be fobbed off with the nihilistic complaint that 'they'll only be back out in a couple of days'. This feeble abdication of responsibility neither gives the public the protection to which it has a right, nor obtains the care to which the mentally ill have a right.
Dr Philip Timms
Senior Lecturer in
Community Psychiatry
Guy's & St Thomas's UMDS
London SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments