Letter: How many people should be farming the land?

Mr Humphrey Errington
Thursday 20 May 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Sir Simon Gourlay's article (17 May) is a good account of the stupidity of the new EC support scheme for agriculture. But his assumption that the inevitable trend is towards ever fewer farmers/farm workers is simply an echo of Ministry of Agriculture thinking since the Second World War - which produced, inter alia, incentives to amalgamate farms, enlarge fields and buy labour-saving machinery.

Of course, no one wants to use a shovel when they can buy a muck-scraper, but it is possible to operate farming systems in the Nineties that keep people on the land in dignified employment. The trouble is that the Ministry of Agriculture is not interested in encouraging this option. My farm is only 300 upland acres, but because we choose to milk 400 sheep and make cheese, it supports eight jobs.

Our reward is to be excluded from much of the subsidy support given to our more conventional neighbours, who employ nobody. Moreover, because our manufacture is agriculture-based, we are also denied the types of assistance (for example, for capital investment) given to non-agricultural industry.

Let us by all means have grants for environmental improvement, but is it not time that recognition be given to the importance of farm jobs concerned with food production?

Yours faithfully,

HUMPHREY ERRINGTON

Carnwath,

Strathclyde

17 May

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in