Letter: How Africa uses World Bank aid

Mr David Wallace
Tuesday 25 October 1994 20:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Michael Taylor (letter, 24 October) is right to draw attention to the constraints on Third World countries undergoing World Bank and International Monetary Fund redevelopment programmes. Appeals by Third World leaders for First World investment have gone unheeded, especially since 1989, when the possibility of investment in Eastern bloc countries began to offer itself.

However, straitened circumstances raise the question of priorities, and in the case of Zambia education has never been high on President Chiluba's list. At his first public meeting in London, soon after his sweeping electoral victory, he was pressed about his plans to repair the education service that had performed so well in the immediate post-independence decade. His answer was that he saw openings for private investment and missionaries, hardly an answer to build confidence in potential investors.

In modern times, who is going to invest in a country in which a public education service is an insignificant part of the infrastructure? It is arguable that in the case of South Africa the absolute need of industry and commerce for a better educated workforce was a strong disincentive to continue with apartheid.

Yours faithfully, DAVID WALLACE Hove, East Sussex 24 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in