Letter: Housing ills
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Lord Strathclyde's claim (letter, 25 June) that there has been a reduction in the number of unfit houses, should be viewed with caution. The Institution of Environmental Health Officers believes that the Independent interpreted the results of the English House Conditions Survey correctly when it reported that there has been an increase in the number of unfit dwellings.
In 1986 there were 909,000 unfit homes in England and in 1991 the figure rose to 1.456 million, representing an increase of about 60 per cent. It is true that the Government changed the definition of what constitutes an unfit home in 1990, and the 1991 House Condition Survey was carried out under a new standard. However, the fitness standard represents a minimum habitable standard and to have such a level of unfit housing in England must have a significant impact on the health of individuals living in those houses.
For the Government to argue that 1.4 million unfit homes is good news is carrying optimism a little too far.
Yours faithfully,
NICK WILSON
Assistant Secretary
The Institution of Environmental
Health Officers
London, SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments