Letter: Hospital mergers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.YOUR REPORT on the increasing number of hospital mergers (11 March) did not touch on the two most vital issues.
The prime reason given by the Royal College of Surgeons and the BMA for merging so as to obtain catchment populations of upwards of 500,000 is that otherwise it is not possible to provide continuous consultant cover, and thus safe emergency services, 24 hours a day, every day of the year. It is better - measured in terms of survival - for patients with life- threatening conditions to be transported a few more miles into the hands of top-class experts than to have the convenience of proximity, but thinly spread skills.
The second issue is that the very technological developments that make it vital to centralise emergency care also allow the great majority of non-emergency cases to be treated away from the central hospital. Rather than closing local hospitals, they can be developed in a new role to include specialist outpatient clinics, minor casualty units, radiology and physiotherapy departments, maternity units for normal births and facilities to deal with the elective surgical work which makes up waiting lists.
So rather than most patients having to travel farther (except for emergency care of life-threatening conditions) locality hospitals can bring most of the functions for which most people have to go to hospital much closer to where they live.
Dr RONNIE POLLOCK
MPA Health Strategy and Planning
London NW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments