Letter: Hopes for a TV election debate
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Adam Boulton was not a party to any of the negotiations between the BBC, ITN, ITV and the political parties over the proposed leaders' election debates. His attack on us, arguing that we betrayed our public service remit and "must not be allowed to mess it up again" (Letters 3 July) is self-serving nonsense. Tony Hall in his article for The Independent ("The televised debate that never was", 2 July) and I in my recent speech to the European Media Forum have made clear how close the negotiations came to success, and why they failed - the parties were not prepared to make the marginal concessions which would have resulted in the debates taking place, and once the campaign started in earnest the politicians and broadcasters ran out of time to resolve the outstanding problems.
We all need to think hard and long about the lessons of that experience and how to ensure that in the next general election British voters, like their counterparts in most other democracies, can see the leaders of the main parties debate the major issues on television. One of the questions which should be carefully examined is whether a non-partisan body, such as the independent commission suggested by Stephen Coleman and Julie Hall (Letters, 5 July), could have a role in that process, which next time should start a good deal earlier than the eve of the election campaign.
For Adam Boulton to try to turn this complex and important question into a thinly disguised plug for Sky News is unworthy of him.
RICHARD TAIT
Editor-in-Chief
ITN
London WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments