Letter: Home Secretary's crime proposals are short-sighted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: So Michael Howard has set the agenda for dealing with crimes committed by young people and has proposed new criteria for the granting of bail ('Howard fires 27 shots at crime', 7 October). Perhaps not surprisingly, his 'programme of action against crime' relies heavily on increased use of imprisonment.
The Home Secretary sets the agenda, but it is, of course, the courts that implement it. If Parliament acts on the proposals outlined in the Home Secretary's conference speech, the responsibility will rest on judges and magistrates to assess those occasions when imprisonment - as a sentence for an offence or for the purpose of remand - is deemed necessary.
All the evidence suggests that the numbers are far fewer than the tabloid press and Tory conference would have us believe. However, since the right-wing political U- turn on criminal justice policy earlier this year, the behaviour of sentencers has been to follow this lead with a consequent increase of approximately 6,000 in the prison population since February, and remand prisoners now accounting for more than 20 per cent of the total prison population, with more than 10,000 incarcerated.
The Eighties and early Nineties witnessed a dawning recognition that imprisonment for the majority of offenders is an unnecessary and damaging course of action. Careful plans were laid for a more rational criminal justice policy, with greater use of community sentences and appropriate remands on bail. All of this planning now appears to have been swept aside as we march backwards once again in another ill-informed attempt to crack down on crime.
Yours faithfully,
MIKE WORTHINGTON
Chief Probation Officer
Northumbria Probation Service
Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments