Letter: Hints from the reconstruction of eastern Germany: A selection of readers' letters from the overwhelming response to our 10-point plan for recovery

Mr Clive Hicks
Friday 23 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I would argue for an 11th point to your 10-point manifesto for national recovery (22 October): specific measures to encourage capital investment, particularly capital investment which will generate employment.

I travelled in the eastern part of Germany this year and was deeply impressed by the reconstruction taking place. Again and again I speculated on the mechanisms producing the investment, and asked myself why the same could not be done in Britain. Since my return I have seen some of the German government documents (published in English) on the investment incentives employed. I believe such measures should be used in this country - generous, and early, capital allowances; loan guarantees; interest rate support; fixed-condition loans; tax 'holidays', or a period of reduced tax, for new enterprises - a package of measures like these to encourage investment towards the creation of employment in appropriate parts of the country.

The employment created will contribute towards the cost of the incentives with tax revenue replacing benefit costs.

Yours faithfully,

CLIVE HICKS

London, W4

22 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in