LETTER : High tax means low growth

George Crivelli
Saturday 13 January 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

POLLY Toynbee takes the naive view that increased social security expenditure is desirable and should be financed by increases in taxation ("A little honesty from Labour...", 7 January).

Since 1979 the basic rate of income tax has been reduced from 33 per cent to 24 per cent and the top rate from 83 per cent to 40 per cent. Over the same period expenditure on the NHS has increased by 70 per cent in real terms, education by 50 per cent and the social security budget by 75 per cent.

Nevertheless, Ms Toynbee asserts that taxpayers should dedicate a larger share of their in- come to the DSS budget whilefailing to highlight that it already costs the average taxpayer pounds 15 every working day to finance.

The Government has encouraged private pension insurance because of demographic changes. In 1991 there were 3.3 workers per pensioner; by 2030 there will be only 2.2.

Ms Toynbee's options, far from creating "an honesty which would save the welfare state", would be more likely to end it. Higher taxation would stifle economic growth and create an unsustainable level of welfare expenditure which would eventually have to be cut.

George Crivelli

Kidderminster Hereford and Worcester

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in