Letter: High price for students to pay

Mark Tweedale Et Al
Friday 18 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Letter: High price for students to pay

Sir: Deciding how to solve the funding crisis in higher education will indeed be "the most difficult policy decision on education faced by the Government", as you report (17 July). It is, however, plainly ridiculous to suggest that this can be done in an equitable way by making students pay upwards of pounds 1,000 for their tuition.

Introducing tuition fees and abolishing maintenance grants, an option also said to be included in the Dearing report, would undoubtedly deter those from less privileged backgrounds from going on to higher education. It would ensure that many students finished university with debts of pounds 20,000 plus.

The Government must address the fact that Britain has significantly lower rates of participation in higher education than, for example, France and Germany and has the lowest level of government expenditure on higher education as a percentage of GDP of any country in Europe.

The only solution that will guarantee access to education is for government spending to be increased in line with the increase in student numbers. That might require progressive taxation and a thorough review of government spending priorities. But it would maintain Labour's contract with millions of present and would-be students and their families who were told Labour opposed fees before the general election.

MARK TWEEDALE

President Elect, Bradford College

ADAM MATTHEWS

President, Sheffield University Students' Union

LIZ HUTCHINS

Women's Officer, Sheffield University Students' Union

SOPHIE BOLT

Academic and Welfare Officer, Goldsmiths' College Student Union

DES MINTON

President, Bradford College

PAUL CORNELL

Education and Welfare Officer, University of East London

EMMA NEVILLE

Welfare Officer Elect, Bangor University

RAJ JETHWA

Dearing Watch

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in