LETTER:Hidden benefits of being in the EU
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Well done, Polly Toynbee, for drawing our attention to the dangers of apathy on the part of the pro-Europeans. The anti-Europeans, with their cosy nostalgia and false propaganda, have held sway in the media for far too long.
It is time to acknowledge that the long peace enjoyed by member states of the European Union, invoked with such pride by John Major during the VE Day celebrations, might well not have existed had membership of the (original) EEC not provided its members, former rivals or enemies, with both a common purpose to
ensure the economic and social progress of their countries by common action to eliminate the barriers which divide Europe
and a strong institutional structure within which national conflicts might be resolved.
Yes, there is much that is wrong in the EU, as there is in most national and international institutions. But the faults lie in the detail, not the vision. The majority of EU laws are not made by the European Commission, as some anti-Europeans would have us believe, but by elected government ministers in the Council of Ministers, representing the interests of their constituent states as well as those of the union, If EU legislation is imperfect, it is they who approve or authorise that legislation who are to blame.
The extension of qualified majority voting by the Single European Act 1986, under which a minority of member states may be outvoted, has increased the need for national governments and their representatives to take EU legislation seriously, to strive and to argue for the best solutions.
It is time that membership of the European Union was seen by all groups of society, and particularly by our political representatives, as providing an opportunity to influence EU policy in order to create a better Europe, tailored to the needs of the 21st century. The debate should be not about membership or non-membership of the European Union, but rather on the nature of the union which we wish to create.
Yours sincerely,
JOSEPHINE STEINER
Associate Professor
Faculty of Law
University of Sheffield
Sheffield
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments