Letter: Help for mothers to prevent 'home alone' children
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: 'There must be an alternative to leaving a child alone all day,' said Judge Harrison Hall in sentencing an unmarried mother to six months in jail for working while her two-year-old daughter stayed at home ('Mother jailed for leaving girl on her own', 3 August). What a great pity for other women in her situation, and what a dereliction of duty, that the judge did not use his position to name the alternatives: that we vote for a government that would provide free or affordable care for all pre-school children and that we question why a 23-year-old woman who worked full-time earned only pounds 100 a week.
Unplanned pregnancies have been a feature of human life - upper, middle and lower class - since time began. They will not go away. If this baby was unplanned, should she have been aborted? And if she was planned, should we punish the woman so severely because she chose to earn a private income rather than take public benefits? Her position was invidious and the judges and journalists who comment upon it do so for salaries many times greater than hers.
Society let her down more than she did her own child. Her intention was to provide, society's was to offer Hobson's choice. She could not win.
Yours faithfully,
ELISABETH RIBBANS
London, E14
3 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments