Letter: Help for mothers to prevent 'home alone' children
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I am sure many people will share the 'how could she do that?' attitude of the judge in the case of the mother who left her two-year- old daughter 'home alone', but I hope they will also consider how many more single mothers will be forced into this kind of situation by the Government's review of the benefits system.
If even some of the recommendations of the No Turning Back Group - including its preposterously titled 'Whole Person Benefit' scheme - are adopted, many more women may have to resort to desperate measures to support themselves and their children ('Tory right aims for abolition of most benefits', 3 August).
Promoting an affordable, widely available system of child care would do far more to make working mothers self-supporting and reduce benefit costs than the Government's moralistic stance, as well as decreasing the likelihood of 'home alone' cases.
A further way for the Government to gain a much-needed sense of credibility is to launch a more than perfunctory review of a legal system that jails this 'home alone' mother for six months, but finds it beyond its powers to detain a persistent child molester considered a serious risk to the public.
Yours faithfully,
CLARE JOHNSON
Chelmsford, Essex
3 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments