Letter: Health MP defends cancer test wait as 'normal'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I HAVE every sympathy with Ethel Sanders who faces a short wait for her biopsy at Harold Wood Hospital ('Torture of long wait for cancer test', 14 March).
Clearly, this is a worrying time for Mrs Sanders, but her consultant did see her just three working days after she visited her GP. The consultant decided that Mrs Sanders needed a biopsy within the normal waiting period of one to four weeks. I understand that she is on an admissions list and has an appointment within three weeks of first seeing the consultant.
Your story claimed that a lack of funds contributed to her wait. This is not the case. Clinicians decide priority, not administrators. There is no question of financial constraints resulting in treatment delays for patients classified as urgent by doctors or consultants.
Tom Sackville MP
Parliamentary Under-Secretary
of State for Health
London W1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments