Letter: Hazards of Britain's plutonium stockpile
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: While Greenpeace welcomes the closure of the fast breeder reactor at Dounreay ('Dread of unlimited power fades to black', 28 March), we believe that the true irony surrounding the end of this particular part of the nuclear industry dream deserves more overt consideration.
It is ironic that Dounreay - symbolising the industry vision of using plutonium as a fuel - will close forever in the same week that the new Thorp plant at Sellafield - conceived for the specific purpose of separating plutonium for Dounreay and other fast breeders - begins operation.
Dounreay's closure means that there is now no use for the 36 tons of UK plutonium already stockpiled at Sellafield, nor for the plutonium that will be separated by Thorp. This plutonium stockpile constitutes nothing more than a severe environmental and security hazard and a drain on financial resources not just now, but for many thousands of years to come.
This predicament serves to highlight the confusion and obfuscation that has always surrounded government policy towards the different strands of the nuclear industry in the UK. The forthcoming nuclear review should consider the industry as a whole, to try to prevent such a ridiculous and potentially deadly situation ever arising again.
Yours faithfully,
BRIDGET WOODMAN
Nuclear Campaign
Greenpeace UK
London, N1
30 March
(Photograph omitted)
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments