Letter: Harsh consequences of mineral excavation

Mr Ben Plowden
Thursday 24 June 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Nicholas Schoon's timely article and your leader on the plan to quarry away a mountain on Harris (23 June) highlight the consequences of the Government's commitment to meet the apparently inexorable rise in minerals demand. Despite the current review of national minerals policy, it is evident that this commitment remains firm.

To meet rising demand without exacerbating existing quarrying conflicts in areas such as the Mendip Hills, the Government is encouraging coastal superquarry development in Scotland and elsewhere. Rather than exporting the environmental consequences of minerals extraction from England and Wales, however, the Government should tackle the root cause of the problem.

This entails finding ways of reducing the demand for aggregates and encouraging society to be more 'minerals efficient'. Take John MacGregor's roads programme. The Council for the Protection of Rural England has recently published research suggesting that the minerals needed for the national roads programme up to 2025 would require a hole the size of Oxfordshire more than a metre deep. A similar calculation could be done for the number of Scottish mountains required.

Until the Government reduces the rate of road-building and develops other policies to make us more 'aggregates efficient', we can expect to see the tragedy on Harris played out many times.

Yours sincerely,

BEN PLOWDEN

Council for the Preservation of Rural England

London, SW1

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in