Letter: Handful of sages monopolise media

Mr John Edmonds
Sunday 04 October 1992 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Am I alone among your readers in finding it curious that interviewers in the press, radio and television are only ever able to find a handful of MPs to answer their questions?

Of this select group several would seem to be new knights - Teddy Taylor, Marcus Fox and Rhodes Boyson - while others are new or newish lords.

All have been presumably so rewarded as a result of their heroic accessibility and preparedness to answer questions on anything under the sun, whether or not they know anything about the subject under review.

Various 'personalities', such as Jonathan Miller (though less, recently), Melvyn Bragg and Germaine Greer (rather more, recently), fulfil the same function for the arts. And from time to time past favourites from both fields, whose obituaries we were quite sure we had read, are sounded out about this or that. For the most part, though, we are forced to accept a limited diet of the utterly predictable. It is possible, of course, that all the other several thousand MPs and workers in the arts know nothing about anything, or have speech impediments. Or could it be that those with the job of choosing who should be approached are just incorrigibly lazy?

Yours faithfully,

JOHN EDMONDS

Harpenden, Hertfordshire

2 October

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in