LETTER:Hand signals
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Gerry Hanson
Sir: The only problem with Peter Barnett's otherwise admirable suggestion of motorists signalling a gun towards the temple (Letters, 30 October) is that it can be misconstrued as meaning "you should be shot".
It must be remembered that enraged motorists do not always think rationally, and if a signal can be misinterpreted it often will be.
For our launch on 6 October of the campaign for courteous driving in co-operation with the RAC, we suggested the formal adoption of a signal many motorists already use to say thank you. It is simply to hold the left hand up - fingers closed, open palm facing forward - at rear-view mirror height. The context will explain whether you mean thank you or sorry. In tests this was the only safe signal that was not misunderstood. Its universal use could defuse many potentially explosive situations.
Yours truly,
Gerry Hanson
Chairman, Polite Society
Iver Heath, Buckinghamshire
1 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments