Letter: Half-truths from the anti-car lobby

Mike Hollingsworth
Thursday 28 July 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Once again the same old half- truths are wheeled out by the anti-car lobby ('Government challenged over motoring 'myths' ', 26 July). Motorists and freight hauliers actually pay pounds 23bn in taxes, not the pounds 11bn suggested by Transport 2000. The valuation of external costs is an inexact science, but the external costs of road use are falling as accidents are reduced to record low levels and as pollution from vehicles is reduced.

Congestion costs were recognised by government as a user cost as long ago as 1976. They may be very wasteful and need to be reduced, but they are not external costs paid by non- road users. They are paid for by motorists in lost time and additional fuel purchase.

Of course, public transport is important and we must renew our ageing bus fleet and improve the railways. It is equally true that the taxation of motoring can be made economically and environmentally more effective by taxing use rather than ownership or purchase.

It is not true, however, that road transport fails to meet its full costs, and there is no justification for an overall increase in motoring taxes.

Yours faithfully,

MIKE HOLLINGSWORTH

Head of Policy,

Society of Motor Manufacturing Traders

London, SW1

26 July

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in