Letter: Gross injustice
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Michael Faraway (Letters, 15 October) accuses Liberty of not comparing like with like in its analysis of variations in rates of imprisonment between magistrates' courts. Shepton Mallet, he says, is a different kind of place to South Tameside. And so it is.
However, Home Office research studies confirm 'considerable differences in sentencing' even after allowing for differences in the cases coming before local benches. And in 1990, Houghton- le-Spring, Tyne and Wear, which dealt with virtually identical numbers of burglaries and violent offences, sent one man to prison compared to 30 in South Tameside. The inescapable fact remains that the sentence you receive in magistrates' courts in England and Wales depends less on what you do than on where you live - and that is a gross injustice.
Liberty wishes to see a system of local justice that more obviously lives up to its own high ideas of equity. We make no apology for that.
Yours etc,
PHILIP PRIESTLEY
Liberty
London, SE1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments