Letter: Greenbury hits wrong target
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr R. L. M. Schlee
Sir: There is a widely held view that some highly paid executives, particularly in the privatised utilities, have been overpaid. This view attaches particularly strongly to the share options some of these executives have received.
The Government, in its haste to be seen to be taking action on this issue, has chosen to change retrospectively the rules so as to tax the gains arising on the exercise of share options as income rather than capital gains. The principal effect of this change is to make it impossible for option holders to use their capital gains tax exemption when exercising their share options.
Most of the highly paid "fat cats" will be unaffected by this change since they will already have sufficient capital gains arising on other transactions to use their exemption. Those who have no other capital gains will in any event lose only a small proportion of their total gain.
The impact will therefore fall on middle managers with modest expectations from the exercise of share options for whom this change will be extremely damaging.
It is difficult to conceive of a more inappropriate response to the Greenbury report. If the Government does not reconsider it will probably lose the support of a significant remaining loyal constituency of voters and will deserve to do so.
Yours faithfully,
R. L. M. Schlee
London, SW4
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments