Letter: Green taxation
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: If green taxes have questionable credentials (article, 29 December) it is because they have at best been misused in the UK so far. The major green tax in this country - the levy on motor fuel - has nothing to do with green taxation at all. It is merely a source of government revenue, with none of the resources raised being targeted at mitigating the effects of motoring on the planet.
Truly hypothecated green taxation offers a method by which government can fully enforce the principle that "the polluter pays" and in the process give a boost to energy-saving and waste-minimising industries.
MARK ELTRINGHAM
Egglescliffe, Teesside
Benefit cuts
Sir: Proposals - albeit by civil servants who may or may not be thinking the unthinkable - to cut industrial injury payments, abolish such benefits for existing claimants and pass industrial injury benefit schemes over to private sector administrators appear a recipe for disaster rather than revival in our economy ("Blunkett's disquiet", 22 December).
The Health and Safety Executive's economists estimated in the 1990s that up to the equivalent of one year's total economic growth in the UK was lost each year because of poor health and safety in the workplace.
Prevention is always better than cure. A major way to contribute to national prosperity and job creation would be to cut the appalling UK toll of death and disease in the workplace: far more effective than cutting the benefits of those injured and made ill by their work.
Professor ANDREW WATTERSON
Director
Centre for Occupational and Environmental Health
De Montfort University
Leicester
Funds for the Dome
Sir: Mick Fickling's letter (30 December) gives the impression that the Millennium Experience is being funded from tax revenues. This is simply not the case.
In fact, the Experience is not receiving any money from the
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments