Letter: Good news at the top, but house prices remain low
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Anne Spackman argues that the recent gloom in the housing market has been overstated, in part reflecting the building societies' desire to influence government policy. She points out that the house price indices of the Nationwide and Halifax exclude those houses without a mortgage, which are concentrated at the top of the market and where prices are rising. To a point, this is true.
However, official Department of Environment figures on housing turnover, which include all housing transactions, also show the housing market slowing down. In 1993, housing turnover recorded an average quarterly rise of 5 per cent, in the three months to April turnover was actually lower than in the three months to January. Moreover, given that the Department of Environment estimates that its figures actually lag behind activity in the market by a month, there could be worse to come. The Association of Corporate Estate Agents reported a sharp drop in turnover in April, and net lending commitments, for both the banks and the building societies, were also markedly lower.
The rise in the cost of fixed- rate mortgages and the squeeze on real income from the tax increases are two substantial blows to the housing market. The decision by the Halifax, UBS and others to lower their house forecasts in the light of the recent weakness of the market should be seen only as a realistic reassessment of the trend in house prices.
Yours sincerely,
JAMES BARTY
Senior UK Economist,
Morgan Grenfell
London, EC2
9 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments